Cloud-Native Application Development
Applications designed for the platform they run on, rather than lifted onto it afterwards.
Read moreEvent-driven and serverless design where it genuinely lowers cost and operational load.
Serverless is excellent for spiky, event-driven and low-volume workloads. A service invoked a few thousand times a day can cost almost nothing to run and requires no patching. For steady high-throughput workloads, or anything with strict latency requirements, a container often wins on both cost and predictability.
We help teams tell those cases apart, then build the one that fits — including the parts people underestimate, such as local testing, cold starts, concurrency limits and tracing across asynchronous boundaries.
Idle workloads cost nothing, which suits internal tools and seasonal or bursty traffic well.
No servers to maintain, and a materially smaller operational surface for a small team.
Queues, streams and schedulers used properly, with retries and dead-letter handling thought through.
A development workflow your engineers can actually run without deploying to find out.
We model expected invocation volume and latency needs, and compare serverless against containers on cost.
Function boundaries, event flow, idempotency and failure handling defined before implementation.
Infrastructure as code, local testing, structured logging and distributed tracing across every hop.
Memory, concurrency and timeout settings adjusted against real traffic after launch.
Much less than they were, and provisioned concurrency solves the rest at a cost. For user-facing latency-critical paths it is still worth measuring rather than assuming.
To a degree, yes. Keeping business logic in plain, testable modules with a thin platform-specific wrapper keeps the cost of moving manageable.
Sustained high throughput, long-running jobs, heavy per-request memory, or a team with no appetite for distributed debugging.
Applications designed for the platform they run on, rather than lifted onto it afterwards.
Read moreReduce cloud spend in the right order — visibility, deletion, rightsizing, then commitments.
Read moreService boundaries drawn around real business capabilities, and honest advice when a monolith is better.
Read moreWe will tell you what we would do, roughly what it costs, and whether it is worth doing yet.