Application Re-platforming & Re-architecting
Targeted change that makes an application cheaper to run and easier to maintain, short of a rewrite.
Read moreReplacing ageing systems incrementally, so the business keeps running while it happens.
Legacy systems are usually load-bearing. They are also frequently the only place certain business rules are written down. That combination makes a full rewrite the highest-risk option available, and it is the one most often proposed.
We prefer the strangler pattern: put a boundary in front of the old system, move one capability at a time behind it, and retire the original piece by piece. The business gets value continuously, and there is never a single date on which everything must work.
Capabilities move one at a time, each independently valuable and independently reversible.
Existing behaviour is documented and tested before it is replaced, including the undocumented edge cases.
The first improvement ships in weeks rather than at the end of a multi-year programme.
If priorities change mid-way, you are left with a working hybrid rather than an abandoned rewrite.
The system is documented as it behaves today, including the parts nobody can currently explain.
Capabilities ranked by business value and technical risk to decide what moves first.
A routing boundary is introduced and capabilities are replaced behind it, one at a time.
Old components are decommissioned only once nothing depends on them, verified rather than assumed.
Occasionally — for small systems, or where the platform is genuinely unsupportable. For anything large and business-critical, incremental replacement is almost always lower risk.
That is common. We reconstruct behaviour from the code, the database and observed traffic, and write characterisation tests before changing anything.
Yes. We regularly work around .NET Framework, classic ASP, PHP, on-premises SQL Server and similar. The approach matters more than the language.
Targeted change that makes an application cheaper to run and easier to maintain, short of a rewrite.
Read moreService boundaries drawn around real business capabilities, and honest advice when a monolith is better.
Read moreMoving databases to managed services with replication, verified data integrity and minimal downtime.
Read moreWe will tell you what we would do, roughly what it costs, and whether it is worth doing yet.